06 December 2009

UN Announces Winners of the 2009 ICT Prize


The Rector of the Moscow Institute of Open Education and Jordan's Ministry of Information and Communications Technology have been chosen as the winners of an annual United Nations prize for the use of ICTs in education.

According to a UN press release, the two winners were chosen from among 39 projects in 29 countries by the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for the 2009 UNESCO King Hamad Bin Isa Al-Khalifa Prize.

Under the leadership of Rector Alexei Semenov, the Moscow Institute of Open Education has provided in-service training to about 30,000 teachers annually for the past 16 years.

According to a news release issued by UNESCO, Mr. Semenov has developed exemplary programs to enable teachers to include ICTs in their work, as well as textbooks and teacher guides used widely in Russia and other countries.

Jordan’s Ministry of Information and Communications Technology (MoICT) won the prize for its Jordan Education Initiative. Launched in 2003, the public-private partnership has trained over 3,000 teachers in ICT skills.

UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova will present the 25,000 USD award to each of the two winners at a ceremony on 26 January 2010 at the agency's headquarters in Paris.

Honorable Mentions for this year's Prize went to Thailand Cyber University, which provides ICT training for teachers, and to the Red de Profesores Innovadores (Network of Innovative Teachers) of the Fundación Chile, which has set up a portal to help teachers use ICTs and exchange best practices.

Russian Researchers Criticize How Former Soviet Republics Rewrite History


Itar-Tass Russian press agency reports that in Russia they are unhappy with how most ex-Soviet republics have rewritten their history textbooks.

As part of their national “awakening” the authorities in most former Soviet republics have promoted anti-Russian interpretations of recent (20th century) history. Russian scholars who have studies school manuals in post-Soviet states have found that the books offer an outspokenly “nationalistic interpretation” of historical events, including very old ones. Authors in Ukraine and the Baltic States have displayed the greatest zeal in this respect.

'Acceptable' Books in Belarus & Armenia

A group of Russian scholars under the National Laboratory of Foreign Policy has scrutinized nearly 200 school history books, published in 12 countries once affiliated with the former USSR, says the daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta.

“For a whole year our researchers worked in countries that are Russia’ s near neighbors, holding conferences with young scholars and trying to find out how objectively history was being taught in the schools of the former USSR,” says the board president of the State Club Fund, Kseniya Kostina. “In the end more than 187 manuals were translated.”

The authors concluded that: The post-Soviet space countries, except for Belarus and Armenia, instead of narrating events of history treat school students to a spicy cocktail of myths about the antiquity of their own ethnic group, the high cultural mission of their ancestors, and about their arch foe – Russia.

One of the brightest examples is found in a book by Baltic authors, published within the framework of a Council of Europe-sponsored project. In it the authors discuss the Ethnic Origin of the Stone Age People. This is not a joke, but the title of a whole chapter and the gist of the main theme of the teaching aid in question.

Ukrainian History Turned into Animated Cartoons

According to Russian scholars, Ukrainian history books look pretty much like animated cartoons, in which the good is instantly transformed into evil, without any change of content. Plusses and minuses change place depending on the political requirements.

Ukraine’s unification with Russia is interpreted as Moscow’s recognition of Kiev’s independence. On the political map of that day there suddenly appears some Ukrainian Cossack Power, eventually “wiped out” by Moscow. The reader is told that that event was “one of the greatest crimes of Czarism against the Ukrainian people.”

The director of the Institute of Archaeology of Ukraine’s National Academy of Sciences, Pyotr Tolochko, is quoted by the daily Izvestia as saying that Ukrainian history manuals for secondary schools and colleges and universities are “immeasurably ideologized.”

“In the early history periods everything is branded Ukrainian – starting from Tripolye (an archaeological culture that existed from the 6th millennium to the 3rd millennium B.C.) to Kievan Rus. All these idiocies are squeezed into the manuals to eventually make their way into children’s minds.

Selective Memory

Nezavisimaya Gazeta quotes one of the participants in the project, assistant professor of the National History Department at the Moscow State University, Andrei Shadrin, as saying that for the authors of history manuals “there are far greater values than independence – namely, the selfish interests of ruling elites.”

As an example, Shadrin points to the way Estonian manuals describe in the most positive and optimistic tones the period of Swedish rule. In the meantime, says the scholar, “it was under the Swedes, in the 17th century, that four fifths of the Estonian population perished through famine, plague and wars.”

The authors of the book A History of Estonia say with regret “Why didn’ t the West launch a massive crusade against Rus? By 1240 time had been wasted.”

Another common detail Russian scholars emphasize in their survey. The benefits the former Soviet republics received while being members of the USSR are kept quiet.
Of course, in due time, when inter-state relations are settled, the tone and content of teaching aids may change, scholars speculate. For now, they warn, the risk is high the younger generation will be misled. Whole periods are being erased from history for political reasons.

To read the article in full, please click here.

Private HEIs Unhappy with New Georgian Law


The new Georgian Law on Higher Education, approved in August 2009, intended to place all HEIs, public and private, on equal footing. It seems, however, it has also opened the door for increased government intervention and standardization.

According to the Financial, the online Georgian paper, “The educational system in Georgia has become more authoritarian, meaning private universities have no freedom to act,” says Natela Doghonadze, Vice-president of International Black Sea University (IBSU), a private HEI.

The recent changes in the education system place all universities on equal footing. The question arises, if the same program of study and evaluation system are applied in all HEIs, how will these affect competition between private and public universities, and what will the main basis of differentiation be in the future.

Standardized Grading Schemes

“There are some specificities in student recruitment norms, the evaluation and grading system,” says Nugzar Skhirtladze, head of the quality assurance department of Caucasus University.

In terms of their grading policies, CU and GAU have a minimum threshold of 60 percent (on 100 grading scale), whereas the Minister’s new decree reduces the passing limit to only 51 percent.

“It has been established that 51 percent should be the minimum passing grade and it is now obligatory that universities impose this policy,” says Skhirtladze.

“Lecturers are dissatisfied by the 51 percent limit as they think this does not ensure that students have sufficient knowledge in their subjects,” says Doghonadze, IBSU.

Standardized Calendar

Another change relates to the academic calendar. All HEIs are now supposed to provide a total of 38-45 weeks of academic work per anum. Michael Cowgill, President of Georgian American University (GAU) speaks of the problem that might arise due to the decreased number of holidays.

“What this 19-week semester schedule does is that it limits the number of classes you can take in summer. In the regulation, students have the right to re-take a subject, if they have previously failed or want to improve their grade. GAU, like other universities, has used the summer semester as a time when you can re-take courses so as not to disrupt your regular annual schedule,” Cowgill added.

In response, Mariam Gersamia, head of the Public Relations Department of the Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia claims that the duration of the study is not defined exactly, more attention is paid to number of credits and this issue is regulated by the law of Georgia on Higher Education and by the decree of the Minister of Education and Science. “Great attention is paid to the number of credits; the number of credits should be calculated on the basis of the European credit transfer and accumulation system. One credit implies 25-30 hours of student’s work; from this, how much is direct contact and how much is independent work, the private universities can decide themselves.”

Cowgill, however, insists that there are some regulatory requirements they must consider in setting up an academic schedule.

“We previously had a schedule based on a 15-week semester. Now we have gone to a 19-week semester. A student is required to spend 25 to 30 hours (both in class and individual preparation) per credit - between 150-180 hours in total for a 6-credit course in one semester.

When you look at a normal class load of 5 courses per semester, there is another regulation that comes into play - a student is not supposed to spend more than 41 hours (in class and studying) in a week for all classes – this is based on what the labor code requires for a normal work. When you do the math, a 15-week semester requires a student to spend 60-70 hours a week. So to comply with the application of the labor code to studying, we have extended the semester to 19 weeks.”

Differences in Mission

Regarding the difference between public and private universities following the change, Tinatin Gugberidze, Director of the PR at CU, says that there will probably be some differences that can’t be regulated.

“There is still a difference between private and public universities,” says Michael Cowgill, GAU.

“Private universities, such as ours, base our programs on a more current market demand, while public universities have an added responsibility to society for their programs. Public universities have some different goals. They have to make sure that the country has enough teachers, engineers and other professionals for the longer benefit of society. For us, our clients are the organizations that hire the students, and that’s how we base our curricula,” says Michael Cowgill, President of Georgian American University (GAU).

“Within the Georgian Association of Private Universities, our goal is to provide a dynamic environment for higher education, that will support the development and growth of HEIs. By implementing effective and innovative activities we would like to improve the level of students within employing organizations,” says Skhirtladze.

“The association should concentrate on what it can do to improve quality as reflected in all aspects of the university - management and administration, academic aspects, and financial profitability. As private universities, we should have more flexibility. Everyone knows that our tuition fees are higher. So why are students willing to pay higher tuition fees? Because they expect a higher quality of education,” says Cowgill.

“We think that students are satisfied with the introduction of the new law, as they have more time, not for academic task fulfillment though. However students are dissatisfied with the reduction of holiday time,” says Skhirtladze. “With the new system, there are two mid terms and a separate final, and the chance to re-take their final exams.”

“If student uses the time productively, spends a little bit time on holidays, you have more time to really try to comprehend the total course. We tried to optimize the time that is better for quality by choosing 19 week semester.” says Cowgill.

Azerbaijan Will Have A New Science Development Fund


AzerTaj Azerbaijani state news agency, via Trend news agency, reports that Azerbaijani President has announced the establishment of a new science development fund that will operate under the Presidential Administration.

The Science Development Fund will aim at:
- ensuring stimulation of fundamental scientific research
- strengthening exploration of the country's natural resources
- preserving the country’s cultural and historical heritage
- increasing effectiveness of research work in various spheres of science
- representing Azerbaijan's science in front of world scientific community

The cabinet of ministers has been asked to work with the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan in preparing the draft statute for the new Fund.

Upon another Presidential decree, Mr. Elchin Babayev, an astronomer, was appointed executive director of the Fund.